Maybe because Plasma changes the GTK theme with kde-gtk-config?
Is it even recommended to use two desktop environments that use different UI toolkits?
is there an systemd-nspawn gui manager?
Does anyone know what could have happened here?
Do you have IP address?
Or maybe uname -a is reading the kernel from the live?
Is it possible not to have the linux-headers package but the linux-api-headers one?
I found chmod hard to understand, can someone explain it in a way easier to understand ?
There is no permission for a ?
Shouldn’t do it by default when ugprading it?
since “a” is “all users” does not that included the owner of the file itself ?
You can try changing theme on the Gnome desktop environment using the Gnome Tweaks.
Is it even recommended to use two desktop environments that use different UI toolkits??
Iirc this is the reason. Or I’m not sure it was the fault of kde-gtk-config, but some package changes the selected theme, so yeah, you should select a gnome theme with gnome tweaks for example. It’s totally possible to have multiple DEs/WMs installed simultaneously, you just need to be aware of the settings that they affect
couldn’t find by myself, help please 🙂
is there an systemd-nspawn gui manager?
Hi everyone. I have a home server running Arch and today I found it like this. Does anyone know what could have happened here? Rebooting ends on the same screen
If this happened after kernel upgrade, you can try booting from live medium and downgrading kernel via arch-chroot
Looks like kernel panic. You can maybe check from journalctl if it has recorded the cause of that
I don’t have a shell. You mean from live?
Yeah boot archiso and check from there
How do I know if I’m getting an IP address. I tried nmtui just now and it doesn’t matter what I try to ping it keeps saying network is unreachable. I checked rfkill list too and nothing is blocked.
I connected to a different ssid, that worked, and then connected back to the ssid I intended and now that’s working :/
ip a
After selecting Wi-Fi with the error: could not activate connection: not authorized to control networking. I face
I don’t see nothing strange in journalctl. Do you? Should I still downgrade the kernel?
http://ix.io/
Reboot
This
the user who owns it (u),
other users in the file’s group (g),
other users not in the file’s group (o), or
all users (a).
since “a” is “all users” does not that included the owner of the file itself ?
then Chmod 600 , i can Chmod 600 ( chmod u+rw,u-x,g-rwx,o-rwx) instead of
Chmod 600 ( chmod a+rwx,u-x,g-rwx,o-rwx)
the user who owns it (u),
other users in the file’s group (g),
other users not in the file’s group (o), or
all users (a).
since “a” is “all users” does not that included the owner of the file itself ?
then Chmod 600 , i can Chmod 600 ( chmod u+rw,u-x,g-rwx,o-rwx) instead of
Chmod 600 ( chmod a+rwx,u-x,g-rwx,o-rwx)
a stands for ugo
there’s not a permission for a, indeed
there’s not a permission for a, indeed
There is no permission for a ? i got this from website:
Chmod 600 ( chmod a+rwx,u-x,g-rwx,o-rwx)
there is a inside..
Chmod 600 ( chmod a+rwx,u-x,g-rwx,o-rwx)
there is a inside..
no, when you set permission for a you set permission for u,g,o at once
I see.. why then the webpage write like this :
( chmod a+rwx,u-x,g-rwx,o-rwx) , why not just ( chmod u+rw,u-x,g-rwx,o-rwx) instead
( chmod a+rwx,u-x,g-rwx,o-rwx) , why not just ( chmod u+rw,u-x,g-rwx,o-rwx) instead
it’s redundant
when you set a numeric permission you replace any previous value, so adding everything and removing the others it’s not needed. you simply replace them (600 is u=rw,go=)