Doesn’t GNU have this weird half tabs braces tho?

Heretic people all over the world have claimed that this inconsistency is … well … inconsistent, but all right-thinking people know that (a) K&R are right and (b) K&R are right. Besides, functions are special anyway (you can’t nest them in C).

@nocturn9x calling the kettle black

this is what the doc says

it’s based, will keep using it

die.

no

I have an excuse to force them in the style guide of my language at least, since you can nest them in Peon :333

Also put the return type alone on a line sars

I am lost

I myself do prefer the opening curly brace on the same line. Not going to use your made up word @nocturn9x .

uhm

kernel brace is not for that kind of style

I didn’t make up any word for that because it already exists

are we talking about if they’re called kernel braces or curly braces or the placement of braces

It’s also the style GNU recommends

it’s called the right way

ever looked at glibc?

It’s retarded

Like what kind?

the placement

why can a function that tells me if a character is alphanumeric segfault

only the GNU gods know

You have no style, will ignore.

Doesn’t GNU have this weird half tabs braces tho? Or is it BSD?

but the musl version doesn’t

because the musl version is, correctly, a 1 line function

the GNU one, for some god forsaken reason, is unholy and complicated

Yes

GNU also recommends it, its 2 spaces actually, but yeah it also qualifies as a half tab

https://drewdevault.com/2020/09/25/A-story-of-two-libcs.html

there, found it

I mean, there is a style where braces are never aligned with any text
Not sure we are speaking about the same thing

this whole argument is a mess

makes me crack every time

You are just too drunk