Suppose user install gimp, libreoffice etc from Endeavor OS repo, will he get different package as compared to installing from Arch repo?

is that all? what’s the matter then?

And if he keeps it up, banned here too.

He obviously whine saying Arch bad

Arch is just Artix with systemd.

Didn’t he say that Arch users are pretentious pricks?

Ah yeah also

I think he runs Artix

Some are. Same can be said for some Artix users.

Much more than that

He was using Artix already when he got banned on the Arch group

second hundredth time more likely

It’s a right of passage, they probably try to get banned in all chats

That’s what I’m thinking also.

Devotion to the truth comes at a price

I heard it is the path to the mighty Gobo Linux

We have been here much longer than you…

Lets start I said from a normal user’s perspective EndeavourOS and Arch is almost same (not exactly). Now tell me there are two users, one installed base Arch using wiki and the DE like XFCE and some theme to decorate it, some fonts all from arch repository and another one installef Endeavour OS. Now what is technically different in the hard disk of these two users?

Endeavour OS has their own repos. Done. Next argument.

No shit, admin.

The additional repos that endevor adds that override arch’s…

No idea, but obviously any package they put in will replace arch’s version.

No, they don’t. But regardless, it’s a different distro.

It is not done. We need to explore it. Suppose user install gimp, libreoffice etc from Endeavor OS repo, will he get different package as compared to installing from Arch repo?

Because they are better that Arch’s ones 😎 (no)

Yes, they will get packages feom endevor first…