Aren’t mount units auto generated by parsing fstab?

artix systemd goes brrrrr

isn’t mount in parallel a bad idea

at least / should have priority, the other one can be in parallel

It just uses automount like everyone

/ is obviously mounted way before fstab is read

oh okay

I don’t know what we’re talking about specifically

just saw systemd and parallel mount

i don’t think that’s the case if you write a .mount yourself

A .mount?

aren’t mount units auto generated by parsing fstab?

manually write a mount service file

you shouldn’t write them yourself unless the start align

and enable it

i shouldn’t but i can

well, this is what science is about after all lol

I gotta say, I like systemd’s “abstraction” of objects

thats not real artix bruv 😤

everything else is meh

tho I never got why systemd has to parse fstab by itself to generate .mount files

but it’s a cool concept

well, it’s not win/nt level abstraction

but yeah

what

leaky abstraction = bad

lgtm

well yes, but that is why I said the concept

you cant separate them

its like saying gubbunism sounds good in theory

the concept to abstract services and some other things into files is cool, it could help to have a more smalltalk like self reflection

>smalltalk

what

unix af

idk i just really hate oop

well smalltalk’s oop is the best one