Isn’t systemd-boot way safer and simpler?

although, per specification, any FAT partition should be valid xd

(i’ve also seen some UEFI systems actually support stuff like NTFS and ext3, but that’s not part of the specification)

isn’t systemd-boot way safer and simpler?

systemd-boot requires your BIOS to support UEFI

which is the case for what i just explained as well, since i’m strictly talking about GPT booting

regardless, even with systemd-boot or grub, the systemd-boot or grub needs to reside on a partition which the BIOS can read

I. Have a problem.

I cant Mount my drive.

share the logs

It’s an nvme ssd

todays most of laptops and PCs are using eufi

My live us says it cant find it in /etc/fstab

i’ve seen some purists still use MBR for their boot because it’s minimal xd

did you specify the mount point?

Mount point is /dev/nvme0n1

that doesn’t make any sense

Yes unless I did it wrong.

/dev/nvme0n1 is the block device

you want to mount a partition, not a whole block device

meaning /dev/nvme0n1p1 or so

but the command is mount /dev/nvme0n1p1 /mnt

to mount the partition on /mnt, as an example

Oh. Ok.

So which ones here do I need? Just the fat32? Or do I need the swap & storage partition?

hey guys, I am new to computer science and I want to know the best book for learning data structures. can anyone recommend something?

what are you doing

Downgrade grub so I can boot back in & switch to systemd-boot.

Latest Grub update – Testing Repo – couldnt boot : archlinux

Latest Grub update – Testing Repo – couldnt boot from archlinux

does grub boot

Basically this.

No.

then it’s not grub’s fault

It just takes me to my mobo BIOS.

did you grub-install